Deontological Moral Theory Essay -- essays research papers

Deontological honorable surmise is a Non-Consequentialist moral theory. While consequentialists suppose the ends always justify the means, deontologists assert that the rightness of an action is non simply dependent on maximizing the good, if that action goes against what is considered moral. It is the inherent nature of the act simply that determines its ethical standing. For example, imagine a situation where there are four critical condition patients in a hospital who each need a different organ in order to survive. Then, a healthy man comes to the determines office for a routine check-up. According to consequentialism, non deontology, the doctor should and must sacrifice that one man in order to save for others. Thus, maximizing the good. However, deontological thought contests this way of thinking by contending that it is immoral to kill the unobjectionable despite the fact one would be maximizing the good. Deontologists create concrete distinctions between what is mor al right and wrong and use their morals as a guide when making wefts. Deontologists generate restrictions against maximizing the good when it interferes with moral standards. Also, since deontologists place a high value on the individual, in some instances it is permissible not to maximize the good when it is detrimental to yourself. For example, one does not need to impoverish oneself to the point of worth littleness simply to satisfy ones moral obligations. Deontology butt end be looked at as a generally flexible moral theory that allows for self-interpretation but like all others theories studied thus far, there are arguments one can make against its reasoning.One objection to deontological moral theory is that the theory yields only absolutes and cannot always justify its standpoints. Actions are either classified as right or wrong with no allowance for a gray area. Furthermore, the strict guidelines tend to conflict with commonly accepted actions. For example, lying is alway s considered chastely wrong--even a white lie. Therefore, one must not lie even if it does more good. In our society although individuals accept lying as being morally wrong, white lies have become an exception. Only having absolutes creates a theory that is extremely hard only to abide by, especially when deontological though permits you from making a choice when that choice would clearly be optimal... ...individual beliefs, one can form their own educated opinions regarding what kind of action he should take. Morals are also not always concrete. Relativist thought contends each group of people may contain different morals. From that opinion, one may assert that morals themselves are not absolute. Still, deontological moral theory provides a strong base for making correct decisions. There are few realistic exceptions to the theory and one can easily strike out when an exception is to be made. So, knowing that deontology creates a valuable beginning for a strong moral theory, on e can simply interpret the theory less strictly. Deontology can be a quite appealing theory when not taken so literally. Clearly, one has morals they consider more important than others. If the theory is adjust for this idea, the notion of moral dilemmas is eliminated and one would be allowed to lie if it saved lives. Deontology when looked at loosely is simply a moral theory that says we have morals and we need to consider them when making decisions. Therefore, one may conclude that the overall principles or deontology are correct and that this moral theory should not be dismissed.