Engineering Ethics

There argon many cases in which the ethics that an channelise has argon put on the line. In some cases, disasters may go on because of something that is known by the engineer, but is never pointed out by the engineer. This is the case in the galoshty of hoses construct by the XYZ hose Company.         It is stock practice among farmers to use the chemic substance anhydrous ammonium hydroxide to fertilize their fields. This is a chemic that reacts violently with water, and therefore moldiness be handled very carefully. This chemical is stored in mobile pressurized tanks that are pulled by tractors. The ammonia is transported from the tanks by the industry wide standard hose that is constructed of steel mesh reinforced rubber. These hoses connect the tanks to pierced hollow blades that then natural language through the soil, and distribute the chemical into the soil.         The XYZ Hose Company, which produces hoses, started to market a rude(a) type of hose, a new heavy-duty ductile reinforced hose. These hoses were less expensive, lighter, and easier to the operate than the steel reinforced hoses. These new hoses also met the industry standards. Tests plump by a advisor told XYZ that the ammonia would non at once react with the pliant, but that the plastic would degrade over time, and set down some of its mechanised properties. After several years, some incidents had occurred where farmers were injure and/or blind due to ruptured hoses. The only warning tail on the hoses tell that they should be re move every few years. XYZ no longer produces these hoses, and the ads that were placed stated that refunds would be given and that the hoses were barely obsolete.         This cases raises many honest issues. Should a product that may not be safe for use be allowed to be change? Why... If you want to waste ones time a full essay, order it on our website: BestEssayCheap.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: cheap essay